Skip navigation.


Council Votes Down Extra $3.1 Million Bond, Smaller Convention Hall Design Promised

Government | Tue, 07/20/2010 - 10:32 pm | Updated 1 year 29 weeks ago | Read 1729 | Commented 4 | Emailed 3
Tags: Cape May Convention Hall. Kimmel Bogrette

By Jack Fichter

CAPE MAY – Voting 3-2, City Council put the brakes on approving an additional bond for $3.2 million to build a new Convention Hall here.

Council will begin working with architect Martin Kimmel to create a design for a smaller, less expensive facility.

There were no surprises in the voting. New councilpersons Jack Wichterman, Deanna Fiocca and Bill Murray kept their campaign promise of a smaller, less expensive Convention Hall. Murray noted the city may have to exceed a $10.5 million bond approved by voters to build a smaller Convention Hall.
A standing room only audience applauded and cheered at the defeat of the $3.1 million additional bond.

Mayor Edward J. Mahaney Jr. and Councilwoman Terri Swain voted for the $3.1 million bond. Two hours of public comment was taken before the vote.

Prior to the vote, Wichterman said the three new councilpersons, following their election, sat in with the outgoing council and learned a number of new details about the Convention Hall project. He said Kimmel told council 40 to 60 percent of drawings for the larger facility could be applied to a smaller design.

Wichterman said the city received an email from the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) stating if the city reverted to a smaller footprint for the hall, it would not have to apply for an additional CAFRA Permit.
He said the city could have a smaller, new Convention Hall up and running by Memorial Day 2012, according to Kimmel.

Wichterman said council did not know at this point how much building it can get for $10.5 million.
He noted a number of items were added on after the voter referendum that approved the first bond including geothermal systems, additional restrooms, enlarging the kitchen and moving the building 24 feet towards Beach Avenue as required by DEP for a CAFRA permit rather than occupying virgin beach.

Prior to the vote, Murray said the proposed Convention Hall “was probably too big for our town.” He said the design needed to be scaled back to conform to the needs of Cape May.
Murray warned that the public cannot “nitpick” on every little detail of the design of a new hall. He said the city needed to proceed with a new design and construction without delay. The present Convention Hall is “a festering sore casting a repugnant shadow on the vitality and beauty of our town,” he said.

He called for detailed drawings and bid specifications to be ready by March 2011 with a contract awarded in May 2011 and construction starting in June.

Fiocca said she believed the Convention Hall vote was the most important one she would cast in her term on council. She said she would not shirk her responsibilities and let the issue go to a voter referendum.

Swain said she has heard mixed opinions on the issue. She said fear tactics had been used.

“I’m really upset this town has gotten so divided,” said Swain.

Mahaney noted seven town meetings were held on the Convention Hall project in the past two years. He said the hall was designed to the public’s specifications and noted the lowest bid came in at $13.6 million.

Based on his interaction with all segments of the Cape May Community, the mayor said he believed the majority of voters still were in favor of building the larger facility because it “was essential for the maintenance of the expected quality of life for residents and business persons as well as the sustainability of an economic climate in which we can all still afford to live here.”

Mahaney said the $3.1 million bond ordinance was crucial to the economic sustainability of Cape May for residents, businesspersons and as a premiere tourist destination. Combined with a city tourism utility, the larger hall would give Cape May a niche in the tourist industry while still serving residents with community events.

Login or register to post comments

Comments (4)

We welcome your thoughts, stories and information related to this article. Read our "Policies and Standards for Comments". Please report comments which do not comply with Policies and Standards. When you are logged-in, you will see a "Flag as offensive" button next to each comment.

Fri, 10/08/2010 - 7:45pm - Posted by: Common Sense

*** Deleted by user ***

Wed, 07/21/2010 - 9:29pm - Posted by: victoriandoctor

You know Sherlock that if any of the business people that claim they need the convention hall to help their business when to their bank to get financing with no information about a business plan, where they will be marketing their product, what it looks like, what their costs would be, and what is their projected sources of income they would be laughed out of the bank. It is the same here, the taxpayers of Cape May were asked to spend even more money for a convention hall with no information about the income, the expenses or the operational cost. As someone said in one of the meetings, the idea is build it and they will come. In the movie it was dead baseball players and they do not spend money. The three council members did the right thing in rejecting what one of the speakers called a ‘white elephant’. The convention hall was a project that has no discernable source of income to cover its true cost but is known to cost significant amounts of money. All of that money has to come from the taxpayer. Would the proponents of the large building be willing to pay more that the pittance that they paid for the old building? Probably not! That amount was, for the Jazz Festival something like $625 for a performance. Most likely you could not open the doors of the now defunct building for that amount of money. Are the taxpayers supposed to subsidize, at great cost, all of the nonprofits that want to use the building? The taxpayer just gave the mall business an over $3 million mall because they needed to help their business. Now the same people want a $13 million and growing convention hall. Where does it end and what is the impact on the taxpayer. The opponents presented solid facts, the proponents presented a lot whining about we need it. We all know now that with not a lot of impact a hall scaled back to what is affordable, can be built by 2012. The new council members did the right thing

Fri, 10/08/2010 - 7:45pm - Posted by: Common Sense

*** Deleted by user ***

Wed, 07/21/2010 - 11:57am - Posted by: joseph

so here we go again lets pay for another set of drawings .some one need to grow a pair of balls and say lets find another way that can save this town some money and can put a useable space out there asap..so i will submit my idea again ...gut out the solarium bldg.and reconfigure so it can be rented out as a meeting hall or an expo space.level the convention hall and have the footing problem either corrected or install new and have a concrete base and floor installed,have a professional tent company install an all weather tent with portable heating and air conditioning.and basic lighting now you can have your fairs, shows, exibits,etc, and yes roller skating too! lights and sound will be rented on an as needed basis to be included in bill to event,can be installed by rental vendor or by town maint, dept who knows maybe jobs can be discovered out of this.all this will cost lots less than 10 mil i am sure .the rest of the money can be used to spruce up the boardwalk and surrounding areas





Calendar search

Date Range Search
Format: 02-11-2012.
Format: 02-11-2012.

more topicsMOST RECENT SPOUT OFFS

more homes TOP HOMES


more classifieds TOP CLASSIFIEDS

Property Transfer Chart