
Architect's rendering of proposed renovation.
CAPE MAY — The city’s Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) granted conceptual approval Nov. 24 for a large renovation to an historic home at 537 Bank Street, a structure that may have housed railroad workers many years ago.
Ron and Terri Diubaldi applied to move the house nine feet away from the property line. A neighboring house encroaches three feet on their property line.
Architect Doortje Schipper, of Fenwick Associates of Linwood, described the homes as so close together “the roofs almost kissed.”
Diubaldi’s house will be set on new pilings. A large addition will be constructed on the back of the house with a rear deck.
A detached garage will be built on the property.
Schipper described the existing house as very modest in terms of detail and very simple. She said they were trying to build on what exists, “not make it more ornate.”
The house has a single gable and an enclosed porch on the front.
Schipper said the house is almost sitting on the ground in an area that floods, near Cape Island Creek and Venice Avenue. HPC Chairperson Mary Ann Gaffney said Venice Avenue was named because of its tendency to flood.
The first level of the renovated house will be raised to a height of 11 feet, said Schipper.
The home will have an elevator going from ground level to an attic. Total size would be 2,300 square feet.
The home would be sided in cedar shingles with white trim. The roof materials will be fiberglass/asphalt shingles, said Schipper.
She requested the use of H B & G Savannah railings made of cellular PVC available with wood or aluminum cores.
Commissioner Corbin Cogswell said non-wood materials were permitted on new construction but not for existing homes that contribute to the historic district.
Schipper requested Anderson windows that were a combination of wood and vinyl. Gaffney said HPC requires wood windows.
The applicant agreed to use wooden railings, doors and windows as per HPC guidelines.
The project will also require pile driving Gaffney said a city ordinance requires a report from a structural engineer to allow pile driving in the historic district.
HPC Solicitor Robert Fineberg said he would check on pile driving regulations affecting the project.
Gaffney said pile driving could cause damage to adjacent old homes.
Schipper said the owners wanted to tear down the house but could not since it is a contributing building to the historic district.
Contact Fichter at (609) 886-8600 Ext 30 or at: jfichter@cmcherald.com
Posts: 15 | Views: 247
Posts: 2 | Views: 42
Posts: 10 | Views: 478
Posts: 2 | Views: 42
Posts: 11 | Views: 902
Posts: 27 | Views: 746
Login or register to post comments
Comments (4)
We welcome your thoughts and information related to this article. Click here to read our "Policies and Standards for Comments".
Fri, 03/06/2009 - 11:57pm - Posted by: Anonymous
Some of us owned the "historic houses" in the historic districts many many years before all the newly elected officials started putting all the rules in place about them. Commentor #1 should do their research. Some of these homes have been in our families for generations. Many of us live elsewhere but have inherited these homes and can't even vote on these new regulations. Don't say don't buy here if you don't want to comply with the new rules. If people really had respect for the historical roots of a place, they would respect the property rights of the owners who have been there for generations. It is expensive to comply with the outlandish rules of construction and materials these HPC commissions want. They are not offering meaningful tax decreases for compliance. And yes, they are not being consistant. Some people get breaks, others don't. Now we are in a horrible recession. When hard times hit in the past, do you think our predecessors were forced to fix their broken windows with the most expensive ones? Do you think their local government told them what type of siding and fencing and doors they had to have. No way - Everyone made do with what they could. Frugality, innovation and tolerance. Values we should be supporting, not regulating away.
Tue, 12/02/2008 - 1:42pm - Posted by: Anonymous
DON'T BUY AN HISTORIC BUILDING IN AN HISTORICAL DISTRICT IF YOU DON'T WANT TO COMPLY. AGAIN,DUE DILIGINCE. YOU COULD SAVE A LOT OF MONEY IF YOU RESEARCH. COMMON SENSE!
Tue, 12/02/2008 - 7:34am - Posted by: Anonymous
The HPC is a joke. Money talks, there is no consistency with their decisions. It's ashame.
Mon, 12/01/2008 - 9:55pm - Posted by: Anonymous
If the city is going to dictate what type of building materials are being used, maybe they should contribute to the annual maintence and upkeep.